Friday, August 8, 2014

Do You Love the City? (Part 3)

Practical Implications for Urban Ministry
            Seeing the city as a strategic center for kingdom outreach begins with a godly perspective of the city. The Old Testament book of Ezekiel ends with the words, “And the name of the city from that time on shall be, ‘The Lord is there’” (48:35). While the prophet is describing the restoration of God’s people to Jerusalem following their captivity in Babylon, followers of Christ today can be encouraged by the reminder that—regardless of the city—God is there.
            If the church accepts the reality that God is already at work in the city, then the church can more easily see the potential for making a difference. Most international urban centers are fraught with systemic problems that cannot be resolved with just another church program. Instead of echoing the despair voiced by so many skeptics, the church can be a beacon of hope by working with community leaders toward improving how the city functions on behalf of its residents. Linthicum describes Christians as being advocates in and for the city:
The church is to be the people of action—those who call the city’s structures and systems to accountability, who defend those oppressed and exploited by those systems, and who minister to those who are deceived but who benefit from that city’s principalities. We Christians cannot bring into being such a city, but we can work, pray, proclaim, and be on the side of the angels! To do so means that we must commit ourselves to work toward the transformation of our city’s inner spirituality. That transformation happens only through the Gospel. This is the vocation or mission of the church of Jesus Christ in each city of the world (1991, 144).

While spiritual issues may lie at the core of urban needs, effective ministry seeks to address the physical consequences of evil as well as the spiritual needs. Of course, the church actively pursues this approach to ministry, not for the purpose of increasing their membership rolls, but simply because Christ’s transforming love demands it of those who have already been changed by the gospel. By doing so, the church serves as a prophet (speaking and acting on behalf of justice and mercy) and as a priest (representing God to the people and interceding on their behalf).
            Intercessory prayer is one of the normal spiritual practices of any church. The urban church values this form of prayer as a primary force for good. The typical public prayers in worship might (among other things) request God’s protection and blessings upon the church family and express a desire for the city to be reached with the message of Christ. But such prayers tend to be self-serving and limit the scope of what God wishes to accomplish through His body as well as in the city (Linthicum 1991, 49). Is there a better, more biblical model to follow in praying for the city?
Jeremiah’s letter to the exiled Judean leaders in Babylon called for a more extensive approach to prayer: “…pray to the Lord on its [the city’s] behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare” (29:7). Linthicum applauds this model prayer and adds these specific instructions: “…the prayers of God’s people are to cover all aspects of a city. This includes praying for the city’s economic health, for safety from conflict, for an end to violent crime, for a reformation of the political process, for the well-being and happiness of all who live in that city, and for justice for all, but especially justice for the poor” (1991, 163). Such prayers are pro-active rather than defensive-oriented (protecting God’s people against an evil city) and encompass a wide range of urban needs which impact all its citizens. This approach toward prayer recognizes the spiritual conflict facing the urban church and engages the enemy in every battle. It also recognizes that God is not just concerned about the spiritual needs of the people but every felt need. So must His people.
Aggressively ministering to the city may require some of Christ’s followers to reverse the church’s historic flight to the suburbs. There are signs that with inner city revitalization taking place in many North American cities, younger generations are choosing to live in city centers to benefit from closer proximity to their work as well as to cultural events. The church should pursue this strategy by encouraging a portion of their members to prayerfully consider this option. But their purpose for living in the city must be very intentional and redemptive. As Tim Keller points out, “If Christians go to urban centers simply to acquire power, they will never achieve cultural influence and change that is deep, lasting, and embraced by the broader society. We must live in the city to serve all the peoples in it, not just our own tribe. We must lose our power to find our (true) power. Christianity will not be attractive enough to win influence except through sacrificial service to all people, regardless of their beliefs” (2006, 39). Choosing this path is risky. Modeling a Christ-like spirit in the city is countercultural.
Living in the city with a missionary-mindset can be beneficial for both the church and the community. Bakke affirms, “There is a relationship always between the presence of the godly and the preservation of urban communities” (1997, 39). When churches fled the city, they not only abandoned the mission but also allowed other non-Christian religions to become more easily established, often in buildings where Christ was once proclaimed (Conn and Ortiz 2001, 320)! Returning to the city opens the door for meaningful ministry once again and communicates to the residents that the church has not given up on them. Ministering through occasional forays into enemy territory does not make a lasting impact. But putting down roots in the community with a long-term commitment and building relationships through serving needs as Jesus did will make a difference.
In the days of Nehemiah after the city walls of Jerusalem were rebuilt, an effort was made to intentionally recruit one of every ten godly people to live in the city (11:1-2). Their presence would be a good influence on other residents. Ten percent could provide the necessary “tipping point” to insure that Jerusalem would maintain the historic values of the faith recently instilled in them once again (Bakke 1997:45). Tim Keller shares a similar viewpoint about impacting greater New York City by increasing the percentage of Christ followers in the metro area (2006, 38). Continuing to ignore the city by being prejudiced against it because it is too corrupt or too difficult will simply marginalize the church’s influence and forfeit opportunities for global impact (Charles 2009, 20).
Not everyone wants to relocate to the inner city. “…Living in a concrete jungle or squalid slum is far less attractive, and undesirable as a place of ministry” when compared to many of the more exotic locations where this generation of God’s people are focused in ministry (Johnstone 1998, 243). But Greenway reminds us, “The question is not whether we prefer to live in cities. The question is whether we will go where workers are needed and where God wants us to go…. Cities offer unique opportunities to reach great numbers of people with the gospel of Jesus Christ and extend his kingdom on earth” (1999, 119). The masses of people and the diversity of languages and cultures make the city one of the most strategic mission fields in the 21st century.
The need to establish the gospel and a reproducing church among unreached people groups today is no less important. But urban areas of the world may provide open doors to some of these hidden peoples when groups of them relocate to a city for greater economic opportunities. Since people in transition are more open to the gospel, could it be that the massive migration of people to urban centers around the world is a part of God’s providential strategy to expose all the nations to the gospel (Greenway 1999, 117)? Many of them migrate to western cities from countries where doing traditional mission work is either illegal or very restrictive. In addition, major population centers referred to as “gateway cities” have been identified in Africa and Asia  “…as portals to unreached and least-evangelized peoples of the world” (Gailey and Culbertson 2007, 166). As a result of the world coming to the city, the mobilized church can close the gap on reaching the unreached.
There is a difference between the churches’ potential for kingdom impact in cities in North America and those in other areas of the world. While churches do exist in most, if not all, of the cities of the 10/40 Window, few of them “…have sufficient numbers of believers and churches to effectively evangelize their city” (Grigg 1995, 22). The global church must make a more concerted effort to plant reproducing churches in these strategic cities of the world, knowing that the faith historically expands out beyond the cities.
In regard to urban areas in North America, Tony Campolo takes the position that many inner city churches are already serving their communities well but are still not doing enough. “…Too often they do not see the larger role that they are being called to assume. Seldom do they realize that the Church is called to be the lead institution that can govern the direction and the character of social change in urban America. Rarely are they aware that the hour has come for them to step out of their societal background and claim control over the destiny of America’s cities. Often these churches already have the human and material resources to get the job done. They must be made to realize that to whom much is given, much is expected” (2000, 60-61).
For many Americans, a mission harvest awaits only a block or two away. Geographically close but culturally distant, their Jerusalem may look more and more every day like Samaria or the ends of the earth, but God is still there. And He is already at work to effect life change and community transformation through people who will love the city as He does.
           

Reference List

Allen, Roland.  1927. Missionary methods: St. Paul’s or ours? rev ed.. London: World Dominion Press.

Bakke, Ray.  1987. The urban Christian: effective ministry in today’s urban world. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

------. 1997. A theology as big as the city.  Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Barrett, David and Todd Johnson.  2005. Annual statistical tables. International Bulletin of Missionary Research 29, no 1 (January); 28-30.

Bosch, David J.  1991. Transforming mission: paradigm shifts in theology of mission.  Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

Campolo, Tony.  2000. Revolution and renewal: how churches are saving our cities.  Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

Charles, Duky.  2009.  The importance and strategic role of the city in missio dei. Lausanne World Pulse (May): 16-20.

Conn, Harvie M. and Manuel Ortiz.  2001. Urban ministry: the kingdom, the city and the people of God.  Downers Grove, IL:  InterVarsity Press.

Gailey, Charles R. and Howard Culbertson.  2007. Discovering missions.  Kansas CityBeacon Hill Press.

Greenway, Roger S.  1978. Apostles to the city: biblical strategies for urban missions.  Grand Rapids, MI:  Baker Book House.

------.  1999. Go and make disciples: an introduction to Christian missions.  Phillipsburg, NJ: P & R Publishing.

Grigg, Viv.  1995. Spiritual warfare and the poor in the gateway cities. In Praying through the 100 gateway cities of the 10/40 window, eds. C. Peter Wagner, Stephen Peters and Mark Wilson, 22-27. Seattle, WA: YWAM Publishing.

Johnstone, Patrick.  1998. The church is bigger than you think: the unfinished work of world evangelizationRoss-Shire, Great Britain: Geanies House.

Keller, Timothy J.  1993. An evangelical mission in a secular city. In Center city churches: the new urban frontier, ed Lyle Schaller, 34-41. Nashville, TN:  Abingdon Press.

------.  2006.   A new king of urban Christian. Christianity Today (May): 36-39.

Latourette, Kenneth Scott.  1975. A history of Christianity beginnings to 1500. Vol. 1. Rev. ed.  New York:  Harper & Row Publishers.

Linthicum, Robert C.  1991.  City of God, city of SatanGrand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.

Maluga, Tom.  1999. Multiplying churches to take cities for Christ: New life for the city through church planting and prayer. In A heart for the city, ed. John Fuder, 171-186.  Chicago: Moody Press.

Newbigin, Lesslie.  1989. The gospel in a pluralist society.  Grand Rapids, MI:  William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Pier, Mac.  2009. Greater New York and the five boroughs: prayer. Lausanne World Pulse.  (July): 24-31.

Roberts, Bob Jr.  2007.   Glocalization: how followers of Jesus engage a flat world.  Grand Rapids, MI:  Zondervan.

------.  2008.  The multiplying church: the new math for starting new churches.  Grand Rapids, MI:  Zondervan.

Schnabel, Eckhard J.  2008.  Paul the missionary:  realities, strategies and methods.  Downers Grove, IL:  IVP Academic.

White, Randy.  2006. The road to urban mission in the new global city.  Common Ground Journal: Perspectives on the church in the 21st century. 4, no. 1 (Fall): 37-48.